Drag Along Rights: What They Mean for Partners and Companies

In the world of business entities, whether corporations or limited liability companies, the relationships among owners are governed by carefully crafted agreements and rules. Among the most important of these are provisions that address what happens when some or all of the owners want to sell the company. One such provision, known as “drag along rights,” plays a critical role in ensuring that a company can be sold smoothly and efficiently, even if not everyone agrees. But what exactly are drag along rights, how do they work, and what does the law say about them? Let’s take a deep dive into these questions, exploring their practical impact, legal framework, and the key cases that have shaped their use.

Understanding Drag Along Rights in Context

Drag along rights are, at their core, a mechanism to prevent minority shareholders or members from obstructing a sale of the company that the majority wants to pursue. Imagine a scenario where a third-party buyer is interested in acquiring 100% of a company, but a small group of minority shareholders refuses to sell. Without drag along rights, these holdouts could block the deal or demand a premium for their shares, complicating or even derailing the transaction. Drag along rights solve this problem by allowing the majority-once a specified threshold of approval is met-to require all other shareholders or members to participate in the sale on the same terms.

These rights are not just theoretical; they are real, enforceable contractual provisions that are typically found in shareholder agreements for corporations, operating agreements for LLCs, and, less commonly, in corporate bylaws or articles of association. Their presence is a sign of sophisticated business planning, as they anticipate and address one of the most contentious issues in closely held companies: how to handle a sale when not everyone is on board.

Where Drag Along Rights Are Found

The most common place to find drag along rights is in a shareholder agreement. This is a contract among the shareholders of a corporation that sets out their rights, obligations, and expectations regarding the ownership and transfer of shares. In the context of an LLC, the document is the operating agreement, which serves as the rule book for how the members interact, vote, and make decisions about the company’s future.

Occasionally, drag along rights are also embedded in a company’s bylaws or articles of association. This is more common in jurisdictions that treat these documents as having contractual force among the shareholders, such as in Delaware or the United Kingdom. However, because bylaws are often easier to amend than contracts, most sophisticated investors and founders prefer to include drag along rights in a separate, binding agreement to ensure stability and predictability.

How Drag Along Rights Operate

The mechanics of drag along rights are straightforward in concept, though the details can vary widely depending on how the provision is drafted. Typically, the agreement will specify that if a certain percentage of the shareholders or members (often a majority or supermajority) agree to sell their shares or interests to a third party, they can require all other holders to sell their shares as well, on the same terms and conditions. This ensures that the buyer can acquire the entire company, rather than being left with a fragmented ownership structure.

For example, consider a five-member LLC in which four members together hold 80% of the company. If those four members want to sell the company and the operating agreement contains a drag along provision triggered by a 75% vote, the fifth member, who owns 20%, can be compelled to sell their interest as well, even if they object. The key is that all sellers, majority and minority alike, must receive the same price per share and be subject to the same terms and conditions, ensuring fairness.

The process typically involves formal notice to the minority holders, a description of the sale terms, and a requirement that the minority execute the necessary sale documents. If a minority holder refuses to comply, the agreement may allow the company or the majority to act as their agent to complete the sale on their behalf.

Balancing the Interests of Majority and Minority Shareholders

While drag along rights are a powerful tool for majority owners, they are not without controversy. From the perspective of minority shareholders or members, being forced to sell their interest-perhaps at a time or price they do not agree with-can feel deeply unfair. For this reason, well-drafted drag along provisions include important protections. Chief among these is the requirement that minority holders receive the same price and terms as the majority. This “equal treatment” principle is essential to the legitimacy and enforceability of drag along rights.

Additionally, agreements often require that minority holders be given adequate notice of the sale and sufficient information to evaluate the terms. Some agreements also allow for a period during which minority holders can object or seek further information, though ultimately, if the procedural requirements are met, the sale will proceed.

Drag Along Rights Versus Tag Along Rights

It’s important to distinguish drag along rights from their close cousin, tag along rights. While drag along rights empower the majority to force a sale, tag along rights protect the minority by allowing them to “tag along” and participate in any sale initiated by the majority. In other words, if the majority finds a buyer for their shares, the minority has the right-but not the obligation-to sell their shares on the same terms. This prevents the majority from cashing out and leaving the minority behind with a new, potentially undesirable owner.

Both types of rights are common in sophisticated shareholder and operating agreements, and together they help create a balanced framework that respects the interests of all parties. Drag along rights ensure that a sale can go forward without obstruction, while tag along rights ensure that minority holders are not left out in the cold.

Legal Framework and Drafting Considerations

The enforceability of drag along rights depends heavily on the language of the agreement and the law of the jurisdiction in which the company is organized. In the United States, Delaware law is particularly influential, as many companies are incorporated there due to its sophisticated and business-friendly legal environment. Delaware courts have repeatedly emphasized that drag along rights are creatures of contract, and their enforceability depends on strict compliance with the terms of the agreement.

A well-drafted drag along provision will address several critical elements. First, it will specify the percentage of ownership required to trigger the right-whether a simple majority, super majority, or some other threshold. Second, it will set out the notice and disclosure obligations, ensuring that minority holders are fully informed of the sale terms. Third, it will require that all sellers receive the same price and terms, preventing discriminatory treatment. Fourth, it will outline the procedures for executing sale documents and completing the transaction, including what happens if a minority holder refuses to cooperate.

Another important consideration is the treatment of appraisal or dissenters’ rights. In some states, minority shareholders have statutory rights to object to a sale and demand a judicial appraisal of the fair value of their shares. Many drag along provisions include a waiver of these rights, requiring minority holders to accept the agreed-upon sale price. However, such waivers must be clearly stated and may not always be enforceable, depending on state law.

Finally, it is crucial to remember that drag along rights do not override fiduciary duties owed by directors, managers, or controlling shareholders. Even if the contractual requirements are met, a sale that is conducted in bad faith, at an unfair price, or with conflicts of interest may still be challenged in court.

Notable Case Law: Rulings on Drag Along Rights

The enforceability and application of drag along rights have been the subject of several important court decisions, particularly in Delaware.

In Halpin v. Riverstone National, Inc., the Delaware Chancery Court considered a situation where the majority shareholders attempted to force a sale using drag along rights, but failed to comply with the procedural requirements of the agreement. The court ruled that strict compliance with the contractual terms was essential, and because the company had not followed the required procedures, the drag along provision could not be enforced (Halpin v. Riverstone Nat’l, Inc., C.A. No. 9796-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 26, 2015)).

Another significant Delaware case is In re Good Technology Corp. Stockholder Litigation. Here, shareholders challenged a sale in which drag along rights were exercised, alleging that the transaction was unfair and that the directors had breached their fiduciary duties. The court made clear that while drag along rights are powerful, they do not excuse directors and controlling shareholders from their duty to act in the best interests of all shareholders. If a sale is conducted in bad faith or at an unfair price, the courts may scrutinize the transaction and, in extreme cases, set aside the exercise of drag along rights (In re Good Technology Corp. Stockholder Litigation, Del. Ch. May 12, 2017).

A further instructive case is In re Trados Inc. Shareholder Litigation, which dealt with the use of drag along rights in a sale where the interests of preferred and common shareholders diverged. The court focused on whether the process and outcome were fair to all shareholders, particularly the minority. The decision reinforced that fiduciary duties remain paramount, and that courts will look closely at whether the sale was conducted equitably, even when drag along rights are exercised (In re Trados Inc. Shareholder Litigation, 73 A.3d 17 (Del. Ch. 2013)).

Practical Implications

For majority owners, drag along rights are an essential tool for ensuring that a sale can go forward without being derailed by minority holdouts. They provide certainty to buyers, who often insist on these provisions as a condition of any acquisition. Without drag along rights, a buyer may be unwilling to proceed, or may demand a lower price to account for the risk of being stuck with minority owners.

For minority owners, drag along rights can be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they guarantee that minority holders will be treated equally in any sale, receiving the same price and terms as the majority. On the other hand, they eliminate the ability to block a sale or negotiate independently. For this reason, minority investors should pay close attention to the terms of any drag along provision, and negotiate for additional protections such as tag along rights, notice requirements, and procedural safeguards.

For buyers, drag along rights are a way to ensure a clean, complete acquisition, free from the risk of minority holdouts. This can be especially important in industries where regulatory or operational concerns make full ownership essential.

Drafting Tips and Common Pitfalls

Drafting effective drag along rights requires careful attention to detail. The provision should clearly state what percentage of ownership is required to trigger the right, whether it applies to all types of sales or only certain transactions, and what procedures must be followed. Notice requirements should be specific, including how and when notice must be given, and what information must be provided. The provision should also address what happens if a minority holder refuses to comply, such as allowing the company or majority to act as their agent.

It is also important to address the treatment of appraisal or dissenters’ rights, particularly in states like Delaware where these rights are robust. If the intention is to waive these rights, the waiver must be explicit and unambiguous.

Perhaps the most common pitfall is failing to follow the procedures set out in the agreement. As the Halpin case makes clear, courts will not enforce drag along rights if the required steps are not followed to the letter. This means that companies and majority owners must be meticulous in complying with notice requirements, timelines, and documentation obligations.

Finally, drafters should remember that drag along rights do not override fiduciary duties. Directors and majority owners must still act in good faith and in the best interests of all shareholders. A sale that benefits the majority at the expense of the minority may be challenged, and courts will look closely at whether the process was fair and the price was reasonable.

The Importance of Drag Along Rights

Drag along rights are a cornerstone of modern corporate and LLC governance, providing a mechanism for majority owners to effectuate sales while ensuring that minority holders are treated fairly. Their enforceability depends on careful drafting, strict compliance with procedures, and respect for fiduciary duties. The key cases from Delaware and the UK make clear that courts will uphold these rights when properly implemented, but will not hesitate to intervene if the process is abused or minority holders are treated unfairly.

For founders, investors, and buyers alike, understanding drag along rights is essential to navigating the complex landscape of business ownership and exit strategies. Whether you are negotiating a shareholder agreement, considering an investment, or planning a sale, it is crucial to pay close attention to these provisions and consult with experienced legal counsel to ensure that your interests are protected.

If you are considering including or challenging drag along rights in your company’s agreements, it is always wise to consult with an attorney who is familiar with your jurisdiction’s corporate law and the specific language of your agreements. The right legal advice can make the difference between a smooth sale and a costly dispute.

---

Howard Law is a business, regulatory and M&A law firm in the greater Charlotte, North Carolina area, with additional services in M&A advisory and business brokerage. Howard Law is a law firm based in the greater Charlotte, North Carolina area focused on business law, corporate law, regulatory law, mergers & acquisitions, M&A advisor and business brokerage. Handling all business matters from incorporation to acquisition as well as a comprehensive understanding in assisting through mergers and acquisition. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements. The information on this website is for general and informational purposes only and should not be interpreted to indicate a certain result will occur in your specific legal situation. Information on this website is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.