Business Sellers: Why Hiring an M&A Attorney Beats a Business Broker Every Time

Selling your business is one of the biggest financial decisions you will make. While business brokers advertise "turnkey" solutions and promise to tap their networks, their 10–15% fee on the sale price can translate into tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of dollars lost. On top of that, you still need an attorney to draft and negotiate purchase agreements, due diligence, and closing documents. By contrast, a skilled M&A attorney can guide you through the entire process for a fraction of the cost, owe you a fiduciary duty, and put your interests first.

Here, well explore the entire business sale process, from initial preparation through closing, and demonstrates why working with an M&A attorney offers superior value, stronger advocacy, and significant cost savings compared to hiring a traditional business broker.

What You Need Before Selling Your Business

Before you can effectively market and sell your business, you need to assemble a comprehensive package of information that will allow potential buyers to evaluate your company and make informed decisions. This preparatory phase is critical because incomplete or disorganized documentation can delay the sale process, reduce buyer confidence, and ultimately diminish your sale price.

The first and most important category of documents involves your financial statements and projections. Buyers want to see accurately prepared profit and loss statements from the past three to five years, showing consistent revenue patterns, expense management, and profitability trends. Balance sheets provide insight into your company's assets, liabilities, and overall financial health at specific points in time. Cash flow analyses demonstrate how money moves through your business and whether operations generate sufficient liquidity to sustain growth. These financial documents form the foundation of any serious buyer's evaluation and directly influence the valuation and terms they are willing to offer.

Corporate documents represent the second essential category of materials. These include your articles of incorporation or articles of organization, which establish the legal existence of your entity. Bylaws or operating agreements outline the governance structure and operational rules that guide your business. Stock ledgers, membership records, and equity holder agreements document ownership interests and any restrictions or obligations associated with those interests. Buyers need to verify clean title to the business and ensure there are no hidden encumbrances, disputes, or complications that could surface after closing.

The third major component is the Confidential Information Memorandum, commonly known as a CIM. This document serves as your business's sales prospectus and is typically the first substantive information a qualified buyer receives after signing a confidentiality agreement. A well crafted CIM includes an executive summary that captures the essence of your business and its value proposition. It provides a detailed business overview covering your history, products or services, customer base, and operational structure. Market analysis sections contextualize your business within its industry, highlighting competitive advantages, market positioning, and growth trends. The CIM also presents detailed financials in a clear, professional format, along with operational insights that help buyers understand day-to-day business functions. Finally, it articulates growth opportunities and strategic advantages that make your business an attractive investment.

While many business brokers claim that preparing a CIM is part of their value-added service, an experienced M&A attorney can organize, review, and enhance these materials with equal or greater effectiveness. Attorneys bring a legal perspective that ensures accuracy, compliance with federal and state laws, and proper preservation of confidentiality. More importantly, an attorney structures the CIM to protect you from potential misrepresentation or fraud claims while still presenting your business in the most favorable light.

How Business Brokers Market and Sell Your Business

Understanding how business brokers actually operate reveals that their process is far less sophisticated than their marketing materials suggest. Brokers typically follow a standardized playbook that relies heavily on publicly accessible resources rather than proprietary networks or specialized expertise.

The first step in a broker's process involves network outreach. Brokers frequently tout their exclusive access to qualified buyers through established networks built over years in the industry. In reality, most brokers tap into the same online marketplaces, industry contacts, and referral sources that attorneys can access just as easily. The notion that brokers maintain some secret database of eager buyers is largely a marketing myth. Professional networks in the M&A space are built through relationships, reputation, and results, and attorneys who regularly handle business transactions develop connections that are equally if not more sophisticated than those of typical brokers.

Online listings represent the second major component of how brokers market businesses. Aside from the franchise brokerage website, online marketplaces like BizBuySell, BizQuest, and LoopNet have become the primary platforms where brokers advertise businesses for sale. These platforms are freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection, including competing brokers, for sale by owner sellers, and direct buyers. There is nothing proprietary about posting a business listing online. The process involves creating a profile that includes basic information about the business, financial highlights, asking price, and contact information. While brokers may have experience crafting compelling listings, this skill is hardly worth tens of thousands of dollars in commissions, particularly when sellers can access these same platforms directly or work with an attorney to prepare marketing materials.

Buyer qualification is the third function that brokers perform. This involves screening potential buyers to determine their financial capacity, experience, and fit for the particular business being sold. Brokers typically request financial statements, proof of funds, or pre-qualification letters from lenders to ensure that buyers can actually complete the transaction. However, attorneys regularly perform these same vetting processes during client intake and due diligence phases of transactions. In fact, attorneys often conduct more thorough qualification processes because they focus on legal considerations such as non-compete compliance, regulatory approvals, and escrow capabilities, in addition to basic financial qualifications.

A Real Experience That Revealed the Broker's True Loyalty

I learned firsthand about the inherent conflicts of interest that plague the business broker industry during a transaction over a decade ago. I was representing a seller in a business acquisition, and we had reached the stage where we were meeting with a serious buyer to discuss terms and address preliminary questions. My client, the seller, had engaged a business broker months earlier, paying a retainer and agreeing to a 15% commission upon closing.

During the meeting, everything seemed to be progressing well. The buyer asked thoughtful questions about operations, employee retention, and customer relationships. My client provided detailed, honest answers that demonstrated both the strengths of the business and the challenges that any new owner would need to address. About halfway through the meeting, my client excused himself to take an important phone call, leaving me alone in the conference room with the buyer and the broker.

Within moments of the seller leaving the room, the broker leaned toward the buyer and said, "You know, if you're not interested in this business, I have several other opportunities that might be a better fit for what you're looking for." I was stunned. The buyer had not expressed even a hint of disinterest or concern. He had been engaged, asking detailed questions, and taking extensive notes. There was absolutely no indication that he was wavering or considering walking away from the deal.

The broker then stated to buyer, "I don't represent the seller or you. I'm just here to get a deal done, so we can find you something one way or another." This moment crystallized everything wrong with the business broker model. Here was someone who had been paid by my client, who was supposed to be marketing my client's business, and who was actively undermining the deal by suggesting the buyer might want to look elsewhere before any problems had even emerged.

This experience taught me that many brokers view their role not as advocates for sellers, but as deal facilitators who are indifferent to which transaction closes as long as something closes. Their loyalty extends only as far as their next commission check. A broker might have ten listings at any given time and will steer buyers toward whichever deal seems most likely to close quickly, regardless of which seller is best served. This fundamental conflict of interest is inherent in the broker business model and cannot be eliminated through better practices or stronger ethics policies.

Why Attorneys Have Equal or Superior Networks

One of the primary justifications brokers offer for their high commissions is their supposedly exclusive networks of qualified buyers. However, attorneys who regularly handle M&A transactions develop professional networks that are equally sophisticated and often more valuable than those maintained by brokers.

Attorneys cultivate relationships with private equity firms, family offices, strategic buyers, financial advisors, bankers, CPA's, insurance providers, and industry insiders through years of transactional work. When you close deals successfully and develop a reputation for competence and integrity, buyers remember you and reach out when they are looking for new opportunities. Private equity firms in particular often develop ongoing relationships with M&A attorneys because they value working with legal counsel who understand their investment criteria, move quickly, and can structure creative deals that meet complex requirements.

Attorneys also participate in industry conferences, continuing legal education programs, bar association events, and professional networking opportunities that expose them to a wide range of potential buyers and other professionals who work with buyers. State bar association business law sections often host programs specifically focused on M&A topics, bringing together attorneys, accountants, bankers, and business owners who are active in the acquisition space. These relationships are often more substantive than broker networks because they are built on professional collaboration and mutual respect rather than transactional commission splits.

Unlike brokers, attorneys can also leverage their ability to negotiate and draft confidentiality agreements, handle complex cross-border regulatory issues, and manage sophisticated transaction structures that appeal to more qualified and better-capitalized buyers. High net worth individuals and institutional buyers often prefer working directly with attorneys because they appreciate the legal sophistication and fiduciary responsibility that lawyers bring to the table.

Furthermore, client referrals represent one of the most powerful network effects in the legal profession. When you successfully guide a business owner through a sale, that client becomes an advocate who refers other business owners considering exits. Those referrals come with built-in credibility and trust that no amount of broker cold calling can replicate. Over time, this referral network compounds, creating a steady stream of both seller and buyer relationships that can be matched effectively.

Breaking Down the Real Costs: Broker vs. Attorney

The financial comparison between hiring a business broker and working with an M&A attorney reveals a stark difference that can save sellers tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of dollars. Let's examine a realistic scenario based on a business selling for one million dollars.

A business broker typically charges between 10% and 15% of the purchase price as their commission. On a one million dollar transaction, this translates to a fee of $100,000 to $150,000. This commission is usually paid at closing out of the seller's proceeds, directly reducing the net amount you walk away with. Brokers often argue that this fee is justified because it covers marketing, buyer identification, qualification, and facilitation of negotiations. However, as we have discussed, these services largely consist of posting listings on publicly available websites, making phone calls, and coordinating meetings. Critically, the broker's fee does not include legal services. You still need to hire an attorney to draft and negotiate the purchase agreement, handle due diligence responses, structure the transaction properly, and manage the closing process. This means you are paying both the broker commission and legal fees, compounding your total transaction costs.

By contrast, an M&A attorney working at an hourly rate between $300-$400 per hour can handle the entire transaction for a fraction of the broker's commission. Initial preparation and document organization typically requires 20 to 40 hours of work, costing $8,000 to $16,000. This includes reviewing financial statements, organizing corporate documents, preparing or reviewing the confidential information memorandum, and developing a marketing strategy. Drafting the purchase agreement, which is the core legal document that governs the transaction, typically takes 15 to 30 hours depending on complexity, translating to $6,000 to $12,000. Negotiations and closing coordination, including due diligence responses, issue resolution, and final document preparation, usually require an additional 10 to 20 hours, or $4,000 to $8,000.

When you add these components together, the total legal fee for comprehensive M&A representation typically ranges from $38,000 to $76,000 for a one million dollar transaction. Even at the high end, this represents far less of what you would pay a broker, and you receive more comprehensive service because your attorney handles both the transactional facilitation and the legal documentation. There are no gaps in service and no coordination headaches between your broker and your lawyer because everything is managed by a single professional who owes you a fiduciary duty.

The cost differential becomes even more dramatic as transaction sizes increase. On a two million dollar business sale, a broker would charge $200,000 to $300,000, while attorney fees might increase to $50,000 to $95,000 because the work involved does not scale linearly with purchase price. A two million dollar deal is not necessarily twice as complex as a one million dollar deal, but most likely will involve a more sophisticated buyers asking more questions and due diligence with an attorney negotiating more finer points in the purchase agreement. Similarly, for smaller transactions in the $500,000 range, brokers often maintain their percentage commission even though the absolute dollar amount is lower, while attorney fees may be proportionally less because the scope of work remains similar.

Beyond the direct cost comparison, there is also the value of fiduciary duty to consider. Attorneys are bound by professional rules of conduct that require them to act in your best interest, maintain confidentiality, avoid conflicts of interest, and provide competent representation. If an attorney breaches these duties, they face professional discipline, malpractice liability, and potential loss of their law license. Business brokers face no such obligations. As my personal experience illustrated, brokers openly admit they represent no one but themselves and their commission. This fundamental difference in legal obligation means that every dollar you pay an attorney buys advocacy and loyalty, while dollars paid to brokers buy only transactional facilitation without any guarantee of loyalty or best interest representation.

Why M&A Attorneys Offer Superior Value Beyond Cost Savings

While the cost comparison alone makes a compelling case for hiring an attorney instead of a broker, the qualitative advantages of attorney representation extend far beyond simple dollar savings. These advantages can significantly impact both the success of your transaction and your financial outcome.

Fiduciary duty represents the most fundamental difference between attorneys and brokers. When you hire an attorney, you enter into a professional relationship governed by centuries of legal ethics and professional responsibility rules. Your attorney must put your interests first, even when doing so conflicts with their own financial interests. If continuing a transaction becomes disadvantageous to you, your attorney must advise you accordingly, even if walking away means they will not get paid for work already performed. Brokers face no such obligation and, as discussed earlier, may actively undermine your interests if they believe a different deal will close more easily.

Negotiation leverage is another critical advantage that attorneys provide. Business brokers typically have limited negotiation skills and even less authority to negotiate on your behalf. They function primarily as intermediaries who relay offers and counteroffers between parties. When brokers overstep that fine line, they are likely violating state laws in the unauthorized practice of law. By contrast, M&A attorneys are trained negotiators who understand how to structure terms, identify leverage points, and advocate aggressively for favorable provisions. Attorneys can negotiate not just on price, but on payment terms, indemnification provisions, non-compete restrictions, employee retention incentives, and dozens of other deal points that collectively determine whether a transaction creates value or exposes you to risk.

Risk mitigation is perhaps the area where attorney value is most apparent. Business acquisitions involve complex legal issues including contract interpretation, regulatory compliance, tax consequences, employment law, intellectual property transfers, and liability management. Attorneys are trained to spot potential problems, assess their materiality, and develop solutions that protect you from post-closing disputes and liabilities. Common issues that attorneys identify include inadequate indemnification provisions that leave sellers exposed to buyer claims, poorly structured earn-out provisions that create disputes over performance metrics, non-compete clauses that are either unenforceable or too restrictive, and escrow terms that trap seller proceeds unnecessarily.

Tax structuring represents another sophisticated area where attorney guidance proves invaluable. Whether a transaction is structured as a stock sale, asset sale, or merger can have profound tax implications for sellers. The allocation of purchase price among different asset categories affects both immediate tax liability and long-term capital gains treatment. Installment sale provisions, seller financing terms, and consulting agreements all carry different tax consequences that must be carefully evaluated. While accountants certainly play a critical role in tax planning, attorneys who understand both the legal structure and tax implications can design transactions that optimize after-tax proceeds while protecting legal interests.

Holistic advisory capabilities distinguish experienced M&A attorneys from transactional brokers. Beyond closing the immediate sale, attorneys advise on related matters including personal liability protection, dispute resolution mechanisms, post-closing obligations, and succession planning for remaining business interests. Many business owners have multiple entities, real estate holdings, or ongoing ventures that must be coordinated with the sale transaction. Attorneys can ensure that selling one business does not inadvertently create problems for other parts of your financial life.

Finally, attorneys provide continuity and relationship value that extends beyond a single transaction. When you work with a broker, the relationship typically ends at closing. Brokers move on to their next listing, and you never hear from them again. When you work with an attorney, you develop an ongoing relationship with a trusted advisor who understands your business, your goals, and your personal situation. This relationship continues after the sale closes and can prove valuable for future transactions, disputes that arise during escrow or earn-out periods, or new business ventures you pursue after exiting your previous company.

Frequently Asked Questions About Selling Without a Broker

Business owners considering whether to hire a broker or work directly with an M&A attorney often have similar questions and concerns. Addressing these common issues can help you make a more informed decision.

One frequent question is whether you can use both a broker and an attorney simultaneously. The answer is yes, you can engage both professionals, but doing so means you will incur both sets of fees without receiving proportional additional value. The broker will charge their 10-15% commission while the attorney will still need to handle all legal documentation, due diligence, and closing coordination. In most cases, the broker's contribution is limited to marketing and buyer identification, functions that attorneys can perform effectively while also handling the legal work. Paying both professionals typically represents an inefficient allocation of transaction costs.

Another common concern is whether brokers ever charge success fees lower than the standard 10-15% range. While negotiated discounts are possible, particularly for larger transactions, small to mid-market deals rarely see meaningful commission reductions. Brokers argue that their costs remain relatively fixed regardless of transaction size, so percentage-based fees are justified. However, this logic actually strengthens the case for attorney representation because legal fees are based on time and complexity rather than purchase price, meaning attorneys often represent better value as transaction sizes increase.

Some business owners ask whether attorneys are legally permitted to solicit buyers and market businesses. This question touches on business broker licensing requirements that exist in many states. Generally, attorneys may not engage in pure "brokering" activities without obtaining appropriate licenses. However, attorneys can facilitate introductions through their professional networks, conduct qualified outreach to potential buyers they have existing relationships with, and market businesses as part of comprehensive legal representation. The distinction lies in whether the marketing activity is incidental to legal representation or the primary service being provided. When an attorney handles the entire transaction including legal documentation and closing, marketing activities are clearly incidental and permissible.

Business owners also wonder about the timeline differences between broker-led and attorney-led sales. Brokers often claim they can move faster because they focus exclusively on sales transactions. However, transaction timelines are typically driven by factors outside any professional's control, including buyer financing, due diligence requirements, regulatory approvals, and negotiation dynamics. An experienced M&A attorney can move just as quickly as a broker on controllable aspects of the transaction while providing superior legal protection and advocacy throughout the process.

Finally, sellers sometimes express concern that buyers will take them less seriously if they are not represented by a broker. This concern is unfounded. Sophisticated buyers actually prefer dealing directly with sellers represented by competent legal counsel because it streamlines communication and eliminates the intermediary who often slows down negotiations. In some cases, the brokers representation or even their franchise brokerage reputation can cause some buyers to not even entertain your business offering. Buyers know they will need to negotiate with the seller eventually, so starting that process earlier typically accelerates rather than delays transactions.

Making the Right Choice for Your Business Exit

Selling your business represents the culmination of years of hard work, sacrifice, and dedication. The professional representation you choose for this critical transaction will significantly impact both your financial outcome and your experience throughout the process. While business brokers market themselves as essential intermediaries with exclusive networks and specialized expertise, the reality is that their services can be replicated by experienced M&A attorneys at a fraction of the cost and with superior legal protection.

The financial comparison alone is compelling. Saving $50,000 to $100,000 or more in broker commissions directly increases the net proceeds you receive at closing. These savings can fund your next venture, enhance your retirement security, or simply reward you appropriately for the value you have built. Beyond cost savings, working with an attorney provides fiduciary protection, negotiation expertise, risk mitigation, and holistic advisory services that brokers simply cannot match.

My personal experience watching a broker actively undermine a seller's interests in pursuit of his next commission reinforced what I already knew intellectually: brokers have no loyalty to sellers and no legal obligation to act in their best interests. They are transaction facilitators motivated by closing deals, not advocates committed to maximizing seller outcomes. This fundamental conflict of interest cannot be overcome through better practices or stronger ethics because it is inherent in the broker business model.

If you are considering selling your business, I encourage you to consult with an experienced M&A attorney before engaging a broker. Discuss your situation, timeline, and goals. Get a clear estimate of legal fees and compare that to the six-figure commission a broker would charge. Consider whether you value fiduciary duty and professional obligation, or whether you are comfortable working with someone who admits they represent only themselves. For most business owners, the choice becomes obvious once they understand the real differences between these two professional options.

Selling your business is too important to leave to intermediaries who lack legal training, owe you no duty, and collect massive commissions for work that can be done better and cheaper by qualified legal counsel. Choose representation that puts your interests first, protects your legal rights, and delivers superior value. Choose an M&A attorney who will guide you through the entire process from document preparation through closing, ensuring that your business exit achieves the financial and personal objectives you have worked so hard to earn.

Important Legal Disclaimer: This article is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. It reflects perspectives from experienced North Carolina business attorneys and M&A advisors at Howard Law regarding documented cases of business broker misconduct and regulatory failures. This is not legal advice for any specific jurisdiction. Reading or relying on this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Howard Law. Case information is based on publicly available court records and regulatory filings.

---

Howard law is a legal and M&A advisory firm providing experienced representation for buyers and sellers navigating business transactions nationwide. We specialize in protecting client interests from unqualified or unethical intermediaries while ensuring successful deal completion with appropriate professional standards. Contact us at www.ehowardlaw.com